Vishal.
All tools

Free RAG engineering tool

RAG Chunking Calculator

Model your ingestion pipeline before processing a document. Adjust chunk size, overlap, retrieval depth, and vector dimensions to see the resulting token and storage footprint instantly.

Free · No sign-up · Runs entirely in your browser

Inputs

Describe your knowledge base

Quick presets

Estimate

Your RAG ingestion shape

32,500

Source tokens

77

Estimated chunks

2,500 tokens

Retrieval context

462.0 KB

Raw vector storage

Chunking profileBalanced
Effective stride
425 tokens
Overlap ratio
15.0%
Repeated embedding tokens
5,700
Total embedded tokens
38,200
This is a reasonable starting point. Validate it against real queries and retrieval evaluation.

Estimates use a sliding token window and raw float32 vectors. Metadata, index overhead, re-ranking, and provider billing may add storage or cost.

Practical guide

How to choose a RAG chunking strategy

Chunking decides what your retriever can find. Chunks that are too small lose context; chunks that are too large mix unrelated ideas and reduce retrieval precision. Treat the calculator as a starting model, then test the configuration with representative questions from your users.

What the estimates mean

01

Source tokens

Document words are converted using your selected average tokens per word. English prose often lands near 1.2–1.5, while code, tables, and non-English text can differ significantly.

02

Chunk count and duplication

A sliding window advances by chunk size minus overlap. Every overlap repeats content in another embedding request, increasing ingestion tokens and the chance of retrieving near-duplicate passages.

03

Retrieval context

Top-k multiplied by chunk size approximates the maximum retrieved text passed downstream. Your prompt, conversation history, instructions, and generated answer still need context-window space.

04

Vector storage

Raw float32 storage is dimensions multiplied by four bytes for every vector. Real databases add metadata and index overhead, while quantization can reduce the vector footprint.

Don't optimize chunking in isolation

Retrieval quality also depends on parsing, metadata, embedding choice, hybrid search, filters, re-ranking, and evaluation. A smaller chunk is not automatically a better chunk.

Read my production RAG notes

Frequently asked questions

What chunk size should I use for RAG?

A practical starting range is 300–800 tokens. Short chunks improve retrieval precision, while longer chunks preserve more surrounding context. The right size depends on document structure, query style, embedding model, and whether you use re-ranking or parent-child retrieval.

How much overlap should RAG chunks have?

Start around 10–20% of chunk size. Overlap helps preserve facts that cross boundaries, but excessive overlap duplicates embedding work and can return near-identical chunks. Evaluate against real questions rather than treating one percentage as universal.

How is the number of chunks calculated?

The first chunk covers the full chunk size. Every additional chunk advances by chunk size minus overlap. This calculator estimates chunks as 1 + ceiling((total tokens - chunk size) / effective stride) when the document is larger than one chunk.

Does vector storage include database overhead?

No. The storage estimate represents raw float32 vector values: chunks multiplied by embedding dimensions multiplied by four bytes. Vector indexes, metadata, IDs, replicas, quantization, and provider-specific overhead can materially change real storage.